Notification

Get personalized optimization tips, understand your account health and set up completion on the improved "My AdMob page".

European regulations overview and guidance

Publisher integration with the IAB TCF v2.0

Google as a vendor now accepts TC strings using the IAB EU TCF v2.2.
  • TCF v2.1: We will continue accepting TCF v2.1 strings, but encourage CMPs to follow IAB guidance on implementation milestones as the industry moves over to TCF v2.2.
  • Google consent management solutions: Google consent management solutions, available in Ad Manager, AdSense and AdMob's Privacy & messaging tab, supports TCF v2.2 for its European regulations messages, in alignment with the IAB's updated requirements for CMPs.

Google will participate in the IAB Europe Transparency & Consent Framework v2.0 and comply with its Specifications and Policies. We will begin reading and passing the TC string for all ad requests starting from when the IAB fully transitions from TCF v1.1 to v2.0. Until then, if a publisher deploys an IAB TCF v2.0 consent management platform (CMP), there will be no change in our existing ad serving behavior (unless a publisher enables a beta; details to follow).

There are a few important implementation details that publishers should keep in mind if they choose to use the IAB TCF v2.0.

To integrate with the IAB TCF v2.0 a publisher must implement a TCF v2.0 registered CMP on their app. The CMP creates the TC (Transparency & Consent) string and places it in local storage. Then, Google’s SDKs consume the TC string they obtain from local storage.

You must install the Google Mobile Ads SDK (v19.0.0 or later for Android, v7.60.0 or later for iOS) to be able to use IAB TCF v2.0 functionality with your apps.

If you do not have consent for Google for Purpose 1 (Store and/or access information on a device), you should not call Google’s ad tag.

General guidance

If you have already implemented an IAB TCF v2.0 registered CMP on your app, AdMob will automatically begin consuming the TC string from the CMP without the need for re-configuration.

Any CMP vendor selections in your IAB TCF v2.0 registered CMP will override Ad Technology Provider selections in the EU User Consent Controls. This includes if you have selected to serve non-personalized ads for all EEA users via the EU User Consent Controls.

If you have set NPA in your ad request, we will look at that and the consent indicated by the TC string and apply the most conservative setting.

  • Passing TC string to tags: GPT, GPT Passbacks, AdSense, and Ad Exchange Tags will automatically communicate with the IAB CMP to forward the TC string to AdMob without publisher configuration. IMA SDK and Mobile Ads SDK will automatically obtain, parse, and respect the TC string from within local storage. For other tag types you will need to pass the following signals manually: gdpr={0,1} and gdpr_consent={tc string}.
  • Passing TC string to programmatic: The IAB TC string is automatically passed to Google’s programmatic channels without configuration required by publishers.
  • Passing the TC string to non-programmatic creatives: Work with your creative provider to identify whether you need additional configuration for your creatives to ensure they consume the TC string correctly. AdMob offers support for the IAB TCF macros (GDPR and GDPR_CONSENT_XXXX) to enable you to manually pass the TC string to other creative vendors as needed. 
  • Passing TC string to mediation partners: The IAB TC string will be available in device local storage (NSUserDefaults for iOS or SharedPreferences for Android) and accessible to all mediation partners to obtain, parse, and respect when called in a mediation waterfall request.

Consent policies: Personalized & Non-Personalized Ads

As communicated in August 2019, our interoperability guidance is intended to reflect Google's existing policy requirements, in particular the requirements of Google's EU User Consent policy and our policies against fingerprinting for identification (for example, those contained in our Requirements for Third-party Ad Serving). Google’s policies continue to apply and are more restrictive than TCF v2.0 in some cases.

Publishers should review the registration settings for the vendors they choose to work with via the TCF v2.0. The following requirements apply specifically when Google is a vendor in the publishers’ CMP.

Google will serve personalized ads when all of the following criteria are met:

  • The end user grants Google consent to:
    • Store and/or access information on a device (Purpose 1)
    • Create a personalized ads profile (Purposes 3)
    • Select personalized ads (Purposes 4)
  • Legitimate interest (or consent, where a publisher configures their CMP to request it) is established for Google to:
    • Select basic ads (Purpose 2)
    • Measure ad performance (Purpose 7)
    • Apply market research to generate audience insights (Purpose 9)
    • Develop and improve products (Purpose 10)

If the consent requirements for personalized ads are not met, Google will serve non-personalized ads when all of the following criteria are met:

  • The end user grants Google consent to:
    • Store and/or access information on a device (Purpose 1)
  • Legitimate interest (or consent, where a publisher configures their CMP to request it) is established for Google to:
    • Select basic ads (Purpose 2)
    • Measure ad performance (Purpose 7)
    • Apply market research to generate audience insights (Purpose 9)
    • Develop and improve products (Purpose 10)

We will handle the following scenarios according to the table below:

Description Ad serving behavior

Lack of consent for Google to store and/or access information on a device (Purpose 1)

In line with our existing EU User Consent policy, consent for cookies or mobile identifiers is required for both personalized and non-personalized ads. For non-personalized ads, consent for cookies or mobile identifiers is still required because non-personalized ads still use cookies or mobile identifiers to combat fraud and abuse, for frequency capping, and for aggregated ad reporting.

Publishers should not call Google’s ad tags.

If consent is missing for Google for Purpose 1 in the TC string, Google will drop the ad request and no ads will be served.

Global scope & Out-of-band scope

Per our existing EU User Consent policy, you must clearly identify each party that may collect, receive, or use end users’ personal data as a consequence of your use of a Google product. Learn more about Scope of Legal Basis

Because it is infeasible to clearly identify each party when using global scope we do not support it. During the transition period that starts when we begin reading and passing the TC string for all ad requests, we will serve non-personalized ads to allow publishers to make adjustments. After the three month transition period, we will not serve an ad if the TC string indicates “Out-of-band” or “Global scope.”

Invalid TC string

The TC string is not parseable (for example some fields are missing).

During the transition period that starts when we begin reading and passing the TC string for all ad requests we will serve non-personalized ads to allow publishers to make adjustments. After the 3-month transition period, we will not serve an ad if the TC string is invalid.

Flexible vendor registration & publisher restrictions

TCF v2.0 affords publishers the ability to customize a variety of restrictions. These allow publishers to indicate their own preferences, which will take precedence over a vendor’s preferences, where applicable. Publishers can never cause a vendor to operate under a lawful basis or for a purpose which conflicts with the vendor’s Global Vendor List registration. Hence these are termed restrictions in that they never expand the scope of what a vendor can do but only restrict it.

Publishers should review the registration settings for the vendors they choose to work with via the TCF v2.0. If a vendor has registered flexibly with “legitimate interest” as the default lawful basis for a purpose where Google requires “consent” per our interoperability guidance, if a publisher wants to work with that vendor via Google products they should choose consent for that vendor in the publisher restrictions of their CMP.

Google is flexibly registered for purposes 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 and defaults to legitimate interest. Unless a publisher configures their CMP to restrict Google to consent for these purposes, Google will rely on legitimate interest where the CMP has established it with the user. Google is not flexibly registered for purposes 1, 3, and 4 and always requires consent for these purposes.

Funding Choices will automatically create publisher restrictions so as to choose consent for Purposes 3 and 4 if a vendor has registered flexibility.

Scope of Legal Basis

The IAB TCF v2.0 provides options for publishers to choose the scope of a legal basis for the processing of personal data as outlined below. This information is passed using the TC string. Google policies require that publishers choose either (a) service-specific scope or (b) group-specific scope.

  • Service-specific scope: A Legal Basis is applicable only on the service, for example a Publisher website or app, on which the Legal Basis is obtained and managed. (ALLOWED when working with Google)
  • Group-specific scope: A Legal Basis is applicable only on a pre-defined group of services, for example a number of Digital Properties of one or more Publishers that implement CMPs with their group’s scope, each of which allows users to manage their choices regarding Legal Bases established for the group across all the services of the group. All component digital properties must be disclosed at the consent moment. (ALLOWED when working with Google)
  • Global scope: A Legal Basis is not only applicable on the service, on which the Legal Basis is obtained and managed, but across all Publisher Digital Properties, that implement CMPs with global scope each of which allows users to manage their choices regarding globally established Legal Bases across all such Publisher Digital Properties. (NOT ALLOWED when working with Google)
  • Out-of-band (“OOB”): A Legal Basis has not been established using the Framework and is therefore not reflected in any Signals within the Framework and cannot be managed by users within the Framework. (NOT ALLOWED when working with Google)

Publishers should choose service-specific (or group-specific) scope if they want to work with Google.

Real-Time Bidding (RTB) & Bidding

The IAB TCF v2.0 logic will apply to bid requests, bid responses and creatives, and cookie-matching requests.

We will allow bid requests to be sent and enable cookie matching when a vendor registers with “Consent” or, in limited cases, “Not used” for Ads Personalization (Purposes 3 and 4 in the TC string). Vendors that register for “Consent” for the Personalized Ads purposes (Purposes 3 and 4 in the TC string), but have not been granted consent by the user:

  • Won’t receive bid requests.
  • Won’t receive a response to cookie match requests.
  • Won’t be allowed to win an auction. Google will block creatives that have vendors that do not meet our policy requirements from winning auctions or serving ads.

Additionally, the user must have given Google consent for Purpose 1, Purpose 3, and Purpose 4.

Mediation

If you have chosen to use the IAB TCF v2.0 solution, please ensure that you are surfacing all of your mediation partners in your CMP. This will ensure that Google can continue to make call outs to all partners in your mediation waterfall.

The TC and AC strings will be evaluated by serving prior to the construction of the mediation waterfall and identify whether the mediation partner is present in one of the strings.

  • If the mediation partner is present and the user has consented or legitimate interest has been established for at least one purpose, the mediation partner will be included in the mediation waterfall as it is constructed.
  • If the mediation partner is not present or the mediation partner has been fully declined by the user, the mediation partner will not be called in the mediation waterfall.

Was this helpful?

How can we improve it?
true
Show your support to promote DEI in Gaming by turning intentions into action!

Check out the newly launched Diversity in Gaming website, where you can find video stories and written pledges from global gaming developers. This campaign centers on 3 pillars: diverse teams, diverse games and diverse audiences showing how diversity is not just good for gamers, but for business as well. Show your support by taking the pledge to promote DEI in Gaming and share it on social!

Learn More

Search
Clear search
Close search
Main menu
13162094537719116563
true
Search Help Center
true
true
true
true
true
73175
false
false