Original Poster
Bas Braams

Most urgent issues for scientific preprints in GDocs

Greetings; here I have assembled what I think are the most urgent issues for using GDocs to typeset a preprint of a scientific article. I'm thinking of applied science, not high-level mathematics, so the demands on the equations editor are modest. I am also expressly thinking of a preprint, not of copy that exactly follows some Journal's guidelines for their printed text.

1. Conversion of the preprint to pdf or to html should not mess up the equations. At present equations come out ugly in some large and fuzzy font.
2. Export to Word should not gratuitously destroy formatting. We are composing a preprint and the text will need final editing in a different system, which will normally be Word. At present subscripts, superscripts and equations all get messed up in the export.
3. One must be able to switch to the roman font inside equations. In applied science the roman font is needed all the time to identify variables. Think of expressions such as T<sub>in</sub>, T<sub>out</sub>. In and out are ordinary words and should appear in the roman font.
4. It must be possible without ridiculous contortions via tables to compose a multi-line equation with well-defined alignment.
5. It should likewise be possible to provide a label to an equation in the most common style; the equation is centered and the label is right-justified.
6. There should be some facility for counters in GDocs that one can use to number equations and references.

I have some other issues with mathematical typesetting, but just refer here to [1] and [2]. Finally, also in equations mode we really need that one-click design to insert special symbols [3].
Community content may not be verified or up-to-date. Learn more.
This question is locked and replying has been disabled. Still have questions? Ask the Help Community.


Some community members might have badges that indicate their identity or level of participation in a community.

Expert - Google Employee — Googler guides and community managers
Expert - Community Specialist — Google partners who share their expertise
Expert - Gold — Trusted members who are knowledgeable and active contributors
Expert - Platinum — Seasoned members who contribute beyond providing help through mentoring, creating content, and more
Expert - Alumni — Past members who are no longer active, but were previously recognized for their helpfulness
Expert - Silver — New members who are developing their product knowledge
Community content may not be verified or up-to-date. Learn more.


Member levels indicate a user's level of participation in a forum. The greater the participation, the higher the level. Everyone starts at level 1 and can rise to level 10. These activities can increase your level in a forum:

  • Post an answer.
  • Having your answer selected as the best answer.
  • Having your post rated as helpful.
  • Vote up a post.
  • Correctly mark a topic or post as abuse.

Having a post marked and removed as abuse will slow a user's advance in levels.

View profile in forum?

To view this member's profile, you need to leave the current Help page.

Report abuse in forum?

This comment originated in the Google Product Forum. To report abuse, you need to leave the current Help page.

Reply in forum?

This comment originated in the Google Product Forum. To reply, you need to leave the current Help page.